Transition Ferndale will have its next meeting in the Ferndale Library, 222 E Nine Mile Road, Ferndale, MI, at 7:00 Wednesday evening, April 16.

We’ll be showing a one-hour video, “Transition 2.0,” with stories from 16 different Transition Town organizations in 7 different countries. Then we’ll have a discussion focused (we hope) on what is being done locally, and what else we might do. The meeting is free and open to the public.

So, what is this transition movement? It’s about making the transition to a society much less dependent on consuming fossil fuel energies. Making many transitions might be a more accurate expression, because every locality will have somewhat different problems, and will evolve different ways of adapting. Concern about climate change, peak oil and economic collapse is a common thread tying all the different locations together.

The transition movement got started with people realizing there is good reason to be worried about both climate change and peak oil. Further, the globalized economy which depends on increasing consumption of fossil fuels is guaranteed to fail as the supply of fuels declines and the ability of the biosphere to absorb industrial waste products also declines.

This is not some abstract notion about the possibility of economic collapse at some distant future date. The economic collapse, in fits and starts, is already happening. Our financial system has already produced far more claims on real wealth than there is real wealth.

Think of dollars as players in a game of musical chairs, with real resources being the chairs. In the child’s game of musical chairs, chairs are removed one at a time, and players are also removed one at a time, in an orderly fashion with no awful consequences.

In our financial system, half or two-thirds of the chairs are already removed. When this round of music stops, the consequences will be extensive and not much fun at all. The scramble for chairs will not be orderly. Most people will not want to continue playing the bank/mortgage/stock market game. That’s one way to describe the coming economic collapse.

Will the collapse of our economy lead directly to the extinction of mankind? Well, if fighting over resources takes the form of nuclear war, then yes. We can hope everybody in charge of nuclear weapons understands there are no winners in a nuclear war.

Now, some people want to believe wars are not fought over control of critical resources. These people don’t have a coherent explanation of World Wars I and II, the multiple wars originating in the Middle East, or border wars from USA-Mexico to Russia-Ukraine. Control of resources is not the only reason for wars, but it is a critical element of every war, and the naked reason for some wars.

But the question is, does our current wrecking of the planet mean that we are headed directly for our own extinction? Collapse, yes; extinction, no, or at least, not necessarily. It’s certainly possible, especially if our reactions are stupid, but the extinction of humanity is not at all certain.

Here’s an excellent explanation of why, from

[begin block quote]

That insistence [humanity will soon be extinct] bespeaks an embarrassing lack of knowledge about paleoclimatology. Vast quantities of greenhouse gases being dumped into the atmosphere over a century or two? Check; the usual culprit is vulcanism, specifically the kind of flood-basalt eruption that opens a crack in the earth many miles in length and turns an area the size of a European nation into a lake of lava. The most recent of those, a smallish one, happened about 6 million years ago in the Columbia River basin of eastern Washington and Oregon states. Further back, in the Aptian, Toarcian, and Turonian-Cenomanian epochs of the late Mesozoic, that same process on a much larger scale boosted atmospheric CO2 levels to three times the present figure and triggered what paleoclimatologists call “super-greenhouse events.” Did those cause the extinction of all life on earth? Not hardly; as far as the paleontological evidence shows, it didn’t even slow the brontosaurs down.

Oceanic acidification leading to the collapse of calcium-shelled plankton populations? Check; those three super-greenhouse events, along with a great many less drastic climate spikes, did that. The ocean also contains very large numbers of single-celled organisms that don’t have calcium shells, such as blue-green algae, which aren’t particularly sensitive to shifts in the pH level of seawater; when such shifts happen, these other organisms expand to fill the empty niches, and everybody further up the food chain gets used to a change in diet. When the acidification goes away, whatever species of calcium-shelled plankton have managed to survive elbow their way back into their former niches and undergo a burst of evolutionary radiation; this makes life easy for geologists today, who can figure out the age of any rock laid down in an ancient ocean by checking the remains of foraminifers and other calcium-loving plankton against a chart of what existed when.

Sudden climate change recently enough to be experienced by human beings? Check; most people have heard of the end of the last ice age, though you have to read the technical literature or one of a very few popular treatments to get some idea of just how drastically the climate changed, or how fast. The old saw about a slow, gradual warming over millennia got chucked into the dumpster decades ago, when ice cores from Greenland upset that particular theory. The ratio between different isotopes of oxygen in the ice laid down in different years provides a sensitive measure of the average global temperature at sea level during those same years. According to that measure, at the end of the Younger Dryas period about 11,800 years ago, global temperatures shot up by 20° F. in less than a decade.

[end excerpt from Greer]

Clearly, climate change plus peak oil/gas/coal means we are in for a number of rough decades as both population and the industrial economy repeatedly decline in step with declining supplies of affordable fuels. Globalism will disappear, and then perhaps “nations” as they are defined today, with no exception for America. If ‘America’ means the two-party system of George W. Obama Clinton, it’s not a loss to be mourned. But humanity has a shot at surviving.

“Preparing for collapse” sounds a lot like survivalism. There’s a reason for that. Transition towns and survivalism are both responses to the same reasons for anxiety. Climate change, resource depletion (for which peak oil is a specific example) and an unsustainable economy are real problems that are not going away. We’ll all have to respond, both individually and collectively.

The Transition Towns movement generally takes the position that strengthening the local community and the local economy – especially the ability of the local economy to produce food – is the best thing we can do now to prepare for survival. That’s very different than the survivalist approach of hoarding food, ammunition and duct tape for individual survival while the community perishes.

Comments are open below, if you want to disscuss over the internet.

Or, if you’re in the area, you may want to come to the regular Transition Ferndale monthly meeting for a face-to-face discussion. It’s in the Ferndale Library (222 E Nine Mile Road, Ferndale, MI) at 7:00 pm on the third Wednesday of each month. If you can’t make it this month, then maybe later.

If you have a Facebook account, you might take a look at the Transition Michigan group:

At our last meeting in Ferndale (about as southern as you can get and still be in Oakland County), there was a fair amount of interest in permaculture. In northern Oakland County, there is an active and organized group of permaculture enthusiasts. From Ferndale, it takes some driving, but just in case anyone is interested, I’m reproducing below a message from Dana Driscoll. As you will see, they use Meetup, and you do need a Meetup account to use the links:

Hi everyone,

Our OCPM [Oakland County Permaculture Meetup] Monthly Meetup will be next Wednesday [April 9, 2014] at 6:30 PM. We’ll be doing fermented veggies and krauts. Along with the hands-on skill share, we’ll have a potluck (bring any food, labeled), a sale table (bring things to sell if you have them and $$ to buy if you would like) and general community building and conversation. Parking is limited in Dana’s driveway, but there is lots of it out on the road. More info can be found here:

On Sunday, April 27th we are having our 100 Yarden Dash kick off event. The 100 Yarden dash is local challenge to increase the number of food producing yards and landscapes across Oakland County. We challenge you to start a garden if you don’t have one, or expand your current garden if you already do, or create edible landscaping and reduce the amount of “yard”. It’s as simple as growing some vegetables and herbs, planting fruit trees, edible shrubs, or removing your lawn to grow food. Sort-of like Victory Gardening meets the 21st century. YARDening! For this event, we’ll show examples of converted lawn spaces, make signs for our YARDens, and eat some good food. More info on the Dash can be found here:

To signup for the meetup, go here:

Our OCPM May meeting will be held at Strawbale Studio in Oxford, Mi. There will be a short tour of the property and various sustainable and natural building projects. We’ll also focus on a land restoration design discussion/charette centered on a portion of the Strawbale Studio land that was recently disturbed by a pipeline repair project carried out by Enbridge. We hope to gather ideas and strategies that can be propagated across the length of the disturbance of the pipeline that offer ecological and potentially economic yields (food, fiber, habitat, etc.) More info about this meetup is here:

Finally, our OCPM Monthly meeting for June will take place at Bittersweet Farm in Clarkston, MI. We’ll be touring bittersweet farm and learning about biointensive gardening and community food projects. Bittersweet farm produces thousands of pounds of produce for the local food banks each year–this is a wonderful site to visit. More info about this meetup can be found here:

Hope to see you at our upcoming events!
Trevor, Dana, Paul, and Mark

Wednesday, March 19, 7:00 pm

Ferndale Public Library, 222 East Nine Mile Road, Ferndale, MI

This is Transition Ferndale’s regular “third Wednesday of the month” meeting for March.

Ferndale’s Becky Hammond will talk about back yard and front yard gardens, and “weeds” that turn out to be edible; even tasty. Sherry Wells will talk about the Ferndale Time Bank Garden Group. Live in an apartment, with no space for gardening? Maybe a community garden is the way to go. We’ll talk about it.

The meeting is free and open to the public. Light refreshments will be available. of ordinary people doing extraordinary things.

For an unusual instance of planning ahead, next month’s third Wednesday meeting (April 16, 7:00 pm) will feature a 1 hour and 7 minute video, “Transition 2.0.” It features 16 stories from 7 countries around the world. You’ll hear about communities printing their own money, growing food, building localized economies and even setting up community power stations. Transition is a social experiment about responding to uncertain times with community solutions. After the video, we’ll discuss how we might go about solving some local problems. Bring your ideas and your talents to share.

It’s been a tough winter, and it’s not over yet. We need a break. This month’s Transition Ferndale video – “No Impact Man” – has been selected to provide a bit of a break: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 7:00 pm at the Ferndale Library, 222 East Nine Mile Road in Ferndale, MI. [Date corrected from previous error - sorry.]

We’re not getting away entirely from our idea that we need to build a resilient local community. This video is funny, mostly without intending to be humorous, in illustrating how NOT to go about being green.

Let’s set the stage. A middle-class, educated and well intentioned couple lives in a 9th-floor apartment in New York City. They want to see how far they can go to lower their impact on the planet. It’s a noble goal. They didn’t actually set out to make a comedy.

The fun comes from seeing how many of the things they try just do not work at all. The learning experience comes from seeing that some things actually do work. The suspense comes from wondering if this whole experiment will cause them to get a divorce, because after all, just how much unnecessary inconvenience and occasional outright misery will human beings take?

As far as we are concerned, it demonstrates that you can’t do well developing a sustainable lifestyle as a single family going against the current of the society you live in. The wonder is in the lengths this family goes to illustrate the point for the rest of us.

Now, if we can get a whole community moving in this direction, or even just a substantial minority of the local community, it can be a different story – especially if we can agree that if you live on the 9th floor, it’s OK to use the elevators.

The meeting is free, open to the public, with some light refreshments provided. Ready for a break?

Art Myatt

A few days ago, a friend asked for my opinion on the article My reply is below.

Some number of commentators have declared that “the peak oil theory” is dead. The peak oil dogma that died is the vulgar, or grossly oversimplified version. We might even call it the straw man version.

Let’s take one paragraph of the article, and dissect it a bit:

“From this perspective, the world supply of petroleum is essentially boundless. In addition to “conventional” oil — the sort that comes gushing out of the ground — the IEA identifies six other potential streams of petroleum liquids: natural gas liquids; tar sands and extra-heavy oil; kerogen oil (petroleum solids derived from shale that must be melted to become usable); shale oil; coal-to-liquids (CTL); and gas-to-liquids (GTL). Together, these “unconventional” streams could theoretically add several trillion barrels of potentially recoverable petroleum to the global supply, conceivably extending the Oil Age hundreds of years into the future (and in the process, via climate change, turning the planet into an uninhabitable desert).”

Even if all these “potential streams of petroleum liquids” become actual streams of petroleum liquids, it does not mean the supply is “essentially boundless.” If the entire volume of the earth could potentially be turned into oil, the whole earth is a finite volume. All potential sources of oil are some tiny fraction of the earth’s crust, which is itself a small fraction of the earth.

There is in fact some upper limit to how much material can be turned into liquid fuel. If conventional petroleum deposits are the only source, then the limit is less than if other mineral deposits can also be used, but a larger limit is not boundless. A serious approach would then try to determine what the practical limit is.

There are many other flaws just in the one quoted paragraph. For instance, if all the natural gas is to be turned into liquid fuel, then we had better stop heating our buildings with it immediately. Looking at it from the other end, if natural gas is most useful as a heating fuel without the expense of turning it into a liquid fuel, then why would it ever be turned into a liquid fuel? The real answer is, on occasion, sources of gas isolated from the gas pipeline system by hundreds of miles have been turned into liquid fuels so they could be transported by ship or rail.

The point is, any estimate of resources that assumes all natural gas, coal, kerogen, bitumen, etc. will be turned into liquid fuels is making a giant overestimate. There is some limit, and that limit is much closer to Marion King Hubbert’s original estimate of 0.8 – 1.2 trillion barrels than “several trillion [additional] barrels. And if so, then Hubbert’s prediction of the time of the peak [first decade of the 21st century] might be a bit early, but there will still be a definite peak.

Remember that the limit for an individual well is reached, not when it is not technically possible to extract more oil, but when it is no longer profitable to extract oil. The kerogen deposits of the Green River formation in Colorado and Wyoming have been known for more than a century. It has never been economical to extract the kerogen and turn it into liquid fuel. If it never does become economical, then a couple of trillion barrels of speculatively potential oil should disappear from the estimates.

What this article leaves out entirely is any explanation of net energy. Now, net energy is not any harder to understand than net profit. In fact they are entirely parallel concepts. In financial terms, it is more desirable to run a business with a high rate of net profit than a low rate. If the business has a very low rate of profit, or a negative one, then that business should simply close.

Net profit counts the initial investment and the amount returned for that investment. Net energy for the oil business counts the amount of energy it takes to create a saleable fuel, and the amount of energy that fuel, when burned, produces.

Technology to turn kerogen into liguid fuel has been known for many decades. Occasionally, someone or some company believes they have come up with some new wrinkle to makle it cheaper and more efficient. The reason kerogen has never been used to produce liquid fuels on any commercial scale is that the net energy of the produced fuel has so far always been negative. It has literally been a waste of energy, and consequently a waste of money, to turn kerogen into liquid fuel. For instance, you can read about the “Colony Shale Oil Project” in Wikipedia.

About the same time as nuclear-powered submarines were being developed, nuclear-powered airplanes were also thought to have numerous practical advantages over conventional military aircraft. The technologists of the time were very enthusiastic and hopeful. No nuclear-power aircraft were ever flown.

It’s not possible to prove that kerogen will never be a practical source of liquid fuel. What is certain is that nobody today know how to do it. There are tremendous problems in separating kerogen form inert rock, in disposing of the rock if it is dug up or leaving 90% of the kerogen in the ground if it is heated in situ, and so on. I believe it is reasonable to suppose that a hundred year track record means it is never going to be economical.

There’s a good explanation of net energy, along with a chart of the “net energy cliff,” at

In short, the proliferation of energy-intensive and therefore very expensive ways to make liquid fues that we see today is a symptom of peak oil, not a refutation of it. Like any actual scientific idea, while there are people with various degrees of expertise, nobody owns the idea and no person or institution is an authority on it. As I see it, the desperate attempts to find new sources of oil or oil-like substances and to develop them at a very high financial, environmental and political cost is a very big clue that world peak oil is approaching. The political and social consequences are beginning to show in Alberta, in North Dakota, in unwinnable wars in the Middle East, and so on.

Art Myatt

James Howard Kunstler, in his Monday, January 6 column (weekly at, gave his opinion on the future of Japan. In part, he said: “Japan’s ultimate destination is to “go medieval.” They’re never going to recover from Fukushima, their economy is unraveling, they have no fossil fuels of their own and have to import everything, and their balance of payments is completely out of whack. The best course for them will be to just throw in the towel on modernity.” Earlier, he referred to the “mystical horrors of Fukushima,” a striking and accurate turn of phrase.

There’s one big problem with Japan going medieval. The mystical horrors of Fukushima are the result of 3 nuclear reactor meltdowns. Japan has a total of 54 nuclear reactors, of which “only” 3 have melted down so far. The only thing that keeps the other 51 from similarly melting down is, in nuclear industry parlance, “station power.” That is, each reactor and spent fuel pool needs a supply of electricity to run pumps which circulate cooling water to prevent a meltdown.

This is true even at Fukushima reactor #4, which did not have fuel in the reactor at the time of the tsunami. It had fuel rods in the cooling pool, and that cooling pool has pumps to circulate cooling water to prevent a meltdown. It’s true that a cooling pool meltdown in the absence of circulating water might take longer to get started. This is a matter of something like a month for a cooling pool as opposed to a day or less for an operating reactor core.

However, when a cooling pool does melt down, much more highly radioactive material gets released than with a reactor core meltdown. A reactor is typically loaded with several years’ worth of fuel. A cooling pool typically accumulates several decades’ worth.

As bad as the radioactive release of Fukushima is today, 51 more meltdowns, all of which would eventually involve spent fuel as well as reactor cores, would be worse. Most of these other Japanese reactors are not located on the coast, so that runoff goes into the ocean, either. Many are located upwind and upstream of major population centers.

If going medieval means complete collapse of the electrical grid, then Japan is in for a 54-reactor meltdown which will leave the entire country uninhabitable. The same is true for the United States, which has over a hundred reactors. It seems to me that most of the United States would be uninhabitable for this reason. So would Europe; particularly France, which uses nuclear reactors for over 75% of its electrical power.

There is no easy solution for this problem. The best we can do would be to get as much fuel as possible out of cooling pools and into hardened dry cask storage, as fast as possible. this is not anything like a satisfactory solution to the spent fuel issue, but it is much better than continued storage in pools. Of course, we should shut down existing reactors, to avoid making more new and spent fuel rods. Finally, we should certainly not build any new nuclear reactors.

In the longer term, spent fuel stored in casks could be vitrified on site before it is moved anywhere. “Vitrified” means the radioactive elements would be used as a component in making glass pellets. The other ingredients – mostly sand – would both dilute the fuel so that meltdown is no longer possible and encapsulate the radioactive isotopes, keeping them out of our air, water and soil. It is again, not a perfect solution, but it is better than trying to leave the fuel rods permanently in dry cask storage.

Whether, even further down the road, there is some suitable final repository such as Yucca Mountain was intended to be, or if the landscape will forever be burdened with numerous “exclusion zones” zones around the site of every former reactor is unknown. What is known is that if, as a society, we do not take the steps we can take to minimize the danger, it won’t matter. The entire continent will become an exclusion zone.

This topic may seem far from the usual concerns of the Transition movement. However, it will not do us much good to encourage local gardens and other elements of a resilient community, if that community will be destroyed by radioactive fallout. It’s certain we can’t put the nuclear genie back in the bottle (or glass pellets, in this case) if we don’t even try.

Comments on this blog are open.

Art Myatt

American Prospect published a very worthwhile article entitled “Work in the Age of Anxiety – The 40-Year Slump.” You can read the whole thing at

Seriously, it would make sense to go read the article now, before continuing here. What is said here will make much more sense (I hope) if you read the original article.

Unfortunately, there’s no way to comment on the article on their website; no way to engage in a discussion. But fortunately, this is the internet. There are numerous ways to continue a discussion. This post is one of those ways, and comments are available on this blog.

Describing the turnaround decade of the 1970′s, the article discusses the 1973 and 1979 oil shocks, but fails to mention the fundamentals of oil production that made the USA so vulnerable to oil shocks. In 1970, production (actually extraction, but commonly called “production”) of oil in the USA hit an all-time peak. For the century before 1970, American oil production had steadily increased. After, it erratically declined. See, for instance, the chart at

Alaska’s North Slope oil made a temporary reversal of the declining trend, but that lasted only a few years and total production never came near the total of 1970. Later, as wells in the Gulf of Mexico came on line, the rate of decline was considerably slowed for some years.

Even more recently, oil produced by fracking in the Bakken Shale (North Dakota) and the Eagle Ford Shale (Texas) has produced the same sort of blip that North Slope oil did. Given the great decline rate of fracked wells, plus the expense and environmental damage of fracking, that blip should prove as temporary as the one from the North Slope. Regardless of how quickly total production hits its next localized maximum, the oil produced by fracking is much lower in net energy than oil from conventional wells.

Historically, oil production in America has been on a bumpy decline since 1970. Declining oil production has been a fundamental contributor to slow or negative real growth in the American economy. It explains, among other things, the increasing desperation of the American Empire to control the world’s remaining oil reserves, the bulk of which are in the Middle East.

And if world oil is peaking, doesn’t that mean controlling the remaining reserves is in the long run a futile strategy?

A lot of thought is needed to understand the world peak of oil production. If production is measured in barrels, then what we see is very slow growth in spite of very high prices for the last decade or so. You can find a chart of world oil production in Gail Tverberg’s thoughtful article at

This gets tricky, because the last decade of high prices have brought into the world market many new barrels of natural gas liquids, tar sands synthetic crude and heavy oil that has less absolute energy content per barrel than conventional oil and very much less net energy. (Net energy equals energy content minus energy used in extraction, for a first-order definition.)

In other words, measuring oil production in units of volume rather than in units of energy gives a false impression of increase, while energy supplied to the world economy is actually declining. This decline is a fundamental driving element of the world’s declining real economy.

Understanding this point illuminates the desperate measures the financial institutions and their political parties are taking to capture wealth through austerity measures for the rest of us. In the United States, declining per capita energy use is closely linked to declining real wages since the 1970′s, as increasing energy use was previously linked to increasing real wages.

To follow world politics, follow the oil, and more broadly the energy, in the same way as you follow the money. Most importantly, understand that oil depletion, and resource depletion generally, is permanent – not reversible by any possible change in political policy. The consequent decline of the American Empire is also permanent.

This means the whole concept of prosperity for all Americans through economic growth – more and more roads, cars, houses, etc. – is not going to work in the future as it did during the great consolidation of the American Empire following World War 2. The resources to support that empire have largely been used up, and the “secondary” consequences of empire-building – pollution, climate change, acidification of the oceans and so on – are also eating at the foundations.

We can still have a society run for the benefit of ordinary people, but that society will not look like either Smallville or Metropolis 1947-1974. In our future, local resilience will work better than central planning by facists or communists or technocrats.

That leads to yet another article very much worth considering – Seth Godin has given us a direct and clear explanation of the logic of resilience:

In short, all the efforts to prop up our failing corporate economy by financial fraud, politics by commercial advertising, austerity policies, censorship of the internet and other types of state terrorism will not restore the American Empire any more than similar attempts restored the Roman Empire. If we want a viable, sustainable society, we are going to have to create it in opposition to the empire builders.

Art Myatt

Presented by Transition Ferndale at the

Ferndale Public Library, 222 East Nine Mile Road in Ferndale, MI
7:00 pm on Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Greedy Lying Bastards is a documentary film which investigates the climate change misinformation campaign waged by the oil industry and its funded think tanks. The film exposes how a small number of well paid spokespeople have worked to confuse the public and lawmakers on the issue. Both ExxonMobil and Koch Industries are identified in the film as two of the worst culprits funding the denial campaign. In addition to exposing the denial campaign, Greedy Lying Bastards tells the stories of those currently impacted by changing climate.

[The paragraph above is a slightly edited version of the Wikipedia entry]

Free, open to the public. Refreshments will be available.

This showing is one day after the dvd release date for the film, so you may not have seen it yet. Discussion follows.

For a preview, see

Art Myatt

On Wednesday, December 18 at 7:00, Transition Ferndale will be screening “Gasland Part 2″ at the Ferndale Library, 222 East Nine Mile Road, Ferndale, MI., with discussion following. The meeting is free and open to the public. Refreshments will be available. You need not be a resident of Ferndale to attend.

“Gasland Part 2″ is the second documentary on the subject of fracking (formally, high-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing) made by Josh Fox and originally shown on HBO. The first one focused more on showing bad effects of fracking on people living near drill pads. Part 2 focuses more on showing the politics involved, though the new film still includes horrifying examples of why you don’t want a fracking drill pad constructed in your neighborhood.

You may have missed it when Josh Fox brought this film to the Main Art Theater in Royal Oak in October. You may have seen it then and want a friend to see it now.

It’s an especially important topic for Michigan, because the entire Lower Penninsula is above the kind of shale that can be fracked, and because many other areas with similar shale deposits lack adequate water resources to support high-volume fracking. Michigan, in the middle of the Great Lakes, has lots of water available. We are a target.

So far, only 15 or so wells in Michigan have used high-volume fracking. The first one was completed in 2010. Fracking promoters say that fracking has been going on in Michigan for 60 years, but that’s a word game, not a reality. Everything done in Michigan before 2010 used less water (about 100 times less water per well) and less hazardous chemicals in wells that were much shallower and never drilled horizontally. Both types of operation are fracking in the sense that the little outboard you can haul behind a pickup truck and the Great Lakes ore carrier are both boats.

The tagline on our website says, “Coping with peak oil, climate change & a failing economy in S. E. Michigan.” Where does fracking fit into this way of looking at the world?

High-volume horizontal fracking for oil and natural gas is happening only because the conventional sources of oil and natural gas are so depleted the conventional supply is not adequate. Fracking takes more materials and more energy to drill wells that deplete at astonishingly high rates.

Fracking, in other words, is an increasingly desperate and environmentally destructive way to postpone failure of the fossil fuel economy. It’s the view of the transition movement that what we should be doing instead is building resilient local communities that are less dependent on fossil fuels. Fracking takes attention and resources from this effort – and ruins local ground water too. We believe fracking should be stopped because it does permanent damage to the environment and is the opposite of a sustainable source of energy.

We’ll have some local activists who know about fracking on hand to lead discussion after the video. Join us – Wednesday the 18th, 7:00, Ferndale Library.

Art Myatt

Sorry for the late notice. Several of the people on what we are loosely calling the Transition Ferndale steering committee were very involved with the recent elections. It has taken us a while to figure out what to do for the Wednesday, November 20 meeting.

That’s Wednesday, November 20, 7:00 pm at
the Ferndale Public Library, 222 E. Nine Mile Road, Ferndale, MI

The meeting is free and open to the public. Light refreshments will be available. You need not be a resident of Ferndale to attrend.

We’re holding a brainstorming session to see what projects we might work on locally, with our own resources. We do not want to set up committees to study future projects. We want to actually start them – or work on strengthening existing projects if those fit well with the goal of building a resilient local community. We’ll hold a follow-up meeting in December, on Wednesday the 18th.

Of course, the local community in which we are meeting is Ferndale, so we assume a lot of what we’ll consider will be Ferndale projects. However, we don’t intend to be limited to the borders of Ferndale. If you’re from Oak Park or Detroit or Royal Oak or anywhere reasonably close, you’re welcome to attend, to bring your ideas, and so on.

In Transition Town terms, Transition Ferndale intends to be both a local community group and a regional hub. Ferndale is not a market town isolated by farms for thirty miles in every direction. It’s one in a matrix of many cities, and will stand or fall with the entire region. Projects that work in Ferndale will work elsewhere. Projects that work elsewhere will work here. We’re happy to share information in both directions.

What sort of projects? Here’s a list from Sherry Wells’ recent campaign for Mayor:

“Greatly expand resident and business curbside recycling through education and praise. Require public events to follow DIY’s recycling and low-trash. Establish twice-yearly leftover home improvement materials exchange. Promote free bicycle parking; set up free parking areas for scooters and motorcycles. Noise pollution: enforce the ordinance against boom-cars, etc.; study train whistles to determine whether and when they exceed standards. Encourage community and front/back yard gardens plus neighbors planting different items to share–ex: reduce excess tomatoes, increase zucchinis–better food cheaper. Seek businesses which use local resources to provide locally desired products, thus reducing transportation fuel use and costs. Low ground cover not grass on public medians, etc. so no mowing.”

Now, some of the above involves policies that the city government might decide. We can discuss them, now that the election is over, without at the same time discussing who should be elected to what positions. Maybe we can influence the city government to implement them. Others, we can work on with out own resources, if we want.

This is not anything like an exhaustive list. You have your own ideas. As a minimum result of this meeting, we’ll publish a list of everybody’s ideas on the Transition Ferndale website, and invite comments. As we get working projects off the ground, in Ferndale or in the vicinity, we can also publish progress reports.

We hope to see you there. If you can’t make it, but have a project for us to consider, send an email or leave a comment at

Art Myatt


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers